Sample Sidebar Module

This is a sample module published to the sidebar_top position, using the -sidebar module class suffix. There is also a sidebar_bottom position below the menu.

Sample Sidebar Module

This is a sample module published to the sidebar_bottom position, using the -sidebar module class suffix. There is also a sidebar_top position below the search.
Sally's Blog

                                                                                                                                     ABN 89 601 346 935

 

The verb ‘comprise’ means, essentially, ‘to consist of’ or ‘to be made up of’; a whole comprises parts or components, not the other way around. Hence, ‘Australia comprises six states and various territories.’ It is wrong, or at least undesirable, to use this verb in its passive form, i.e. ‘Australia is comprised of six states and various territories.’ For a comprehensive explanation of why this is the case, see Henderson’s detailed essay defending his anti-‘comprised of’ stance.

Of course, the English language is always evolving, and many usages once considered incorrect are now the norm. Increasingly, people say or write ‘comprised of’ instead of ‘comprise/s’, and dictionaries are reflecting this development. According to the OED, both are equally acceptable. Other dictionaries, such as the Macquarie, distinguish between ‘traditional usage’ and employing ‘is/are comprised of’ as a synonym of ‘consist/s of’ or ‘is/are composed of’—warning, however, that, ‘This usage will attract criticism from many careful writers.’ The Collins dictionary remains refreshingly unequivocal: ‘The use of of after comprise should be avoided.’

The point is that, while ‘is/are comprised of’ may not be technically incorrect, it still looks and sounds ugly—a clumsy instance of passive voice, using three words where one would suffice. To quote William Strunk Jnr., advocate of clarity and precision in writing, and author of The Elements of Style:

Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words…for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts.

I don’t think there’s any doubt that if Strunk were around today, he would automatically favour the more economical ‘comprise/s’ over the graceless ‘comprised of’.

Even if sooner or later ‘comprised of’ is universally declared to be on equal footing with ‘comprise/s’, I will still experience what can only be described as grammar rage whenever I see this alternative usage appear in newspapers, magazines, websites, etc. To my mind, it’s up there with ‘very unique’ and ‘flaunting convention’.

So, although Henderson and the rest of us so-called pedants may be swimming against the tide, I think it behoves all good writers and editors to follow his example: expunge ‘comprised of’ wherever you see it, and replace it with an elegant ‘comprise/s’.

David Cohen
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
February 2015

David Cohen is Full Proofreading Services’ guest blogger this month. As one of our contractors, David primarily edits ESL-student assignments. His main area of interest, as both an editor and a writer, is fiction; his own short stories and articles have appeared in The Big Issue, The Courier Mail, Meanjin, Seizure, and elsewhere. He lives in Brisbane, where he works at an academic library and tutors in various tertiary-level writing and editing subjects.

Who We Are

Established in 2007, Full Proofreading Services has quickly built a reputation for excellence and quality services, expanding its client base all over Australia as well as overseas. Qualified proofreaders, editors and writers are available to assist with the ever-increasing volume and variety of work.

Full Proofreading offers a range of services including copywriting, editing and proofreading to a diverse range of businesses, organisations and writers Australia wide and internationally. If you need the assistance of an Australian proofreader, editor or writer, contact us today.